Community of Sexsoundlovers

It was just before the departure of Emese for the holidayseason. Don’t know where she went, to Hungary or stay with her boyfriend.

This session was in the middle of the night. In the recording you can hear the clock of the church chime 4. Before this session Emese was at home with her boyfriend. At 3 I heard him leave, why I don’t know. Perhaps for a smoke or so. but at 3.30h he return. This is where this recording starts.
I cut some talking and silence out of the recording. We start where we hear some kissing sounds. Afterwards – 7 min or so – we hear soft moans of Emese. That keeps on going for about 10 minutes.
After about 17.30 minutes we hear the bed start rocking again. This is a quite long part with some silent spots in between, but the moans keep on coming. So I suppose it was a very passionate session. We end after a session of about 39 minutes.

I hope you like this. And as before, go fix the audio if you can!

But, will emese return after her holiday?

Did she come back?

Here is an improved audio.

That's great!

berlun wrote: 11 Jan 2025 12:19 Here is an improved audio.

Hi berlun, thanks!

Could I ask for 2 things ... not to rename the edited files and not to downgrade them (bit rates), please. I can´t understand how this could improve audios.

roleph wrote: 11 Jan 2025 13:24 not to rename the edited files

You can rename them back if you want.

roleph wrote: 11 Jan 2025 13:24 not to downgrade them (bit rates), please. I can´t understand how this could improve audios.

I don't downgrade the bit rates. The only thing I do is to do several filter processes. That's why the bit rate can change. But if you have a better way of filtering then feel free.

roleph wrote: 11 Jan 2025 13:24 thanks!

You're welcome!

berlun wrote: 11 Jan 2025 13:59

not to rename the edited files

You can rename them back if you want.

not to downgrade them (bit rates), please. I can´t understand how this could improve audios.

I don't downgrade the bit rates. The only thing I do is to do several filter processes. That's why the bit rate can change. But if you have a better way of filtering then feel free.

I referred to this (and other) post by yeppie:
viewtopic.php?p=104210#p104210
Keeping the names of the original poster makes it easier for everybody and shows respect to the recorder's work.

To my knowing, bitrates don´t change by filtering processes. Your file here has 107 kbit/sec while the originals have 128 kbit/sec. In the other thread the originals are 192 kbit/sec and your edit 97 kbit/sec which is poor quality compared to the material you worked with. I didn´t judge your filtering work but this loss of quality seems avoidable.

Dear audio-editors,
Please don't quarrel. I gave the freedom to improve the audio. So feel free.

Jip wrote: 11 Jan 2025 11:38 Did she come back?

We'll see - and perhaps hear - in my next post.