Ninjaearz wrote: 13 Nov 2018 05:18
No it was not.
Just wondering. The way the recording sounded made it look like voice detection was used. With the highs and lows and it seemed like it was fading in and out. I'm a big fan of leaving captures untouched and without any sort of editing. Running it through something like noise reduction more often kills the vibe of the recording.
I do like it but not that much. I gotta be honest, that previous recording of your housemate with the stripper across the hall is probably one of the best housemate sounds i have heard this year, which means i will be revisiting it often. And thats no joke. What especially made it unique was I could clearly here your other housemate nonchalantly walking about doing his business. About as authentic as it comes!
Nonetheless thanks for your efforts ninjaearz, it is clearly appreciated. I think I can be honest with you about the quality of the recording because you want to contribute to this community and become a good member, and also because you seem like a good understanding guy.
Well, to be honest, in my books you are a good member.
We all live and learn, some of our best known contributors lurked for years on this forum before they contributed. I just try and live by the question "if i were to listen to this recording in 5 years, do I just want it to be so and so quality when I'm in this unique situation?"
Well, i have rambled on a bit too much.
Again, thanks for being part of this community ninjaearz, we need more people like you
