The voice or the looks?

[haigha]

Sorry, but at what point in this thread did age and looks get so hopelessly entangled? When I got arrested for my listening activities, the recording was GREAT, but the couple, though youngish, were HORRIBLY ugly! Their looks were definitely a turn-off, but I still enjoyed the recording even knowing that. Naturally, I'd rather hear great sounds from a sexy couple, but sexy sounds come first, I think.

[Summer256]

Curiosity often makes you want to look if the sounds were good. But more often than not, once I've seen them, I didn't want to know. I don't bother trying to find out what they look like now (unless I see them before hand).

[ekoom222]

Interesting post here, makes you think about the past experiences a bit more, and since most of my Aural experiences are roommate related, I had the priviledge (in most cases) of seeing or even getting to know the objects of my Aural pleasure. In my case, the looks were a plus, but in the end, the pleasure of listening was "helped", but I would have listened regardless.

Of all of the girls that my old roommate would bring home, most of them were at least nice bodied, some more than others. None of them were less than a 5 or 6 in my book, with a couple of them scoring near the 8 or 9 mark. One of them, with the initial "N" was a hard 10 or 10.5, seriously beauty pageant type gorgeous, from head to toe. She wasn't the best sounding in bed, but damn if I didn't enjoy the listening and recording!

[Turmoil123]

Sometimes is better to just have voice. Because then they can look however you imagine